17 research outputs found

    Malmheden's theorem revisited

    Get PDF
    In 1934 H. Malmheden discovered an elegant geometric algorithm for solving the Dirichlet problem in a ball. Although his result was rediscovered independently by Duffin 23 years later, it still does not seem to be widely known. In this paper we return to Malmheden's theorem, give an alternative proof of the result that allows generalization to polyharmonic functions and, also, discuss applications of his theorem to geometric properties of harmonic measures in balls in Euclidean spaces

    Two-dimensional shapes and lemniscates

    Full text link
    A shape in the plane is an equivalence class of sufficiently smooth Jordan curves, where two curves are equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by a translation and a scaling. The fingerprint of a shape is an equivalence of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms of the unit circle, where two diffeomorphisms are equivalent if they differ by right composition with an automorphism of the unit disk. The fingerprint is obtained by composing Riemann maps onto the interior and exterior of a representative of a shape in a suitable way. In this paper, we show that there is a one-to-one correspondence between shapes defined by polynomial lemniscates of degree n and nth roots of Blaschke products of degree n. The facts that lemniscates approximate all Jordan curves in the Hausdorff metric and roots of Blaschke products approximate all orientation preserving diffeomorphisms of the circle in the C^1-norm suggest that lemniscates and roots of Blaschke products are natural objects to study in the theory of shapes and their fingerprints

    Laplacian Growth, Elliptic Growth, and Singularities of the Schwarz Potential

    Full text link
    The Schwarz function has played an elegant role in understanding and in generating new examples of exact solutions to the Laplacian growth (or "Hele- Shaw") problem in the plane. The guiding principle in this connection is the fact that "non-physical" singularities in the "oil domain" of the Schwarz function are stationary, and the "physical" singularities obey simple dynamics. We give an elementary proof that the same holds in any number of dimensions for the Schwarz potential, introduced by D. Khavinson and H. S. Shapiro [17] (1989). A generalization is also given for the so-called "elliptic growth" problem by defining a generalized Schwarz potential. New exact solutions are constructed, and we solve inverse problems of describing the driving singularities of a given flow. We demonstrate, by example, how \mathbb{C}^n - techniques can be used to locate the singularity set of the Schwarz potential. One of our methods is to prolong available local extension theorems by constructing "globalizing families". We make three conjectures in potential theory relating to our investigation

    Beurling's theorem for the Bergman space

    No full text
    A celebrated theorem in operator theory is A. Beurling's description of the invariant subspaces in H2H^2 in terms of inner functions [Acta Math. {\bf81} (1949), 239--255; MR0027954 (10,381e)]. To do the same thing for the Bergman space La2L^2_a has been deemed virtually impossible by many analysts, in view of the fact that the lattice of invariant subspaces is so large, and that the invariant subspaces may have weird properties as viewed from the H2H^2 perspective. The size of the lattice can be appreciated from the known fact that essentially every operator on separable Hilbert space can be realized as the compression of the Bergman shift on MNM\ominus N, where MM and NN are invariant subspaces, NMN\subset M. But a Beurling-type theorem is precisely what the present paper delivers. Given an invariant subspace MM in La2L^2_a, consider the subspace MTMM\ominus TM, where TT stands for multiplication by zz. This makes sense because TMTM is a closed subspace of MM. In Beurling's H2H^2 case, MTMM\ominus TM is one-dimensional and spanned by an inner function. In the La2L^2_a setting, the dimension of MTMM\ominus TM may be arbitrarily large, even infinite. However, with the correct analogous definition of inner functions in La2L^2_a, all vectors of unit norm in\break MTMM\ominus TM are La2L^2_a-inner. Following Halmos, the subspace MTMM\ominus TM is called the wandering subspace of MM. Given an invariant subspace, a natural question is: which collections of elements generate it? In particular, one can ask for the least number of elements in a set of generators. It is known that the dimension of the wandering subspace represents a lower bound for the least number of generators. In the paper, it is shown that any orthonormal basis in the wandering subspace (which then consists of La2L^2_a-inner functions) generates MM as an invariant subspace. This settles the issue of the minimal number of generators. Let PP be the orthogonal projection MMTMM\to M\ominus TM, and let L ⁣:MML\colon M\to M be the operator such that TLTL is the orthogonal projection MTMM\to TM. Then, for fMf\in M, f=Pf+TLff=Pf+TLf. If we do the same for LfMLf\in M, we get Lf=PLf+TL2fLf=PLf+TL^2f and, inserting it into the original relation for ff, we get f=Pf+TPLf+T2L2ff=Pf+TPLf+T^2L^2f. As we go on repeating this process, we get f=Pf+TPLf+T2PL2f++Tn1PLn1f+TnLnff=Pf+TPLf+T^2PL^2f+\cdots+T^{n-1}PL^{n-1}f+T^nL^nf. The point with this decomposition is that, apart from the last term, each term is of the form TT to some power times an element of MTMM\ominus TM, so that Pf+TPLf+T2PL2f++Tn1PLn1fPf+TPLf+T^2PL^2f+\cdots+T^{n-1}PL^{n-1}f is in\break [MTM][M\ominus TM], the invariant subspace generated by MTMM\ominus TM. If the operators TnLnT^nL^n happened to be uniformly bounded, as they are in the case of H2H^2, TnLnfT^nL^nf would tend to 00 in the weak topology, and ff would be in the weak closure of [MTM][M\ominus TM], which by standard functional analysis coincides with [MTM][M\ominus TM]. However, for the Bergman space, it seems unlikely that the TnLnT^nL^n are uniformly bounded for all possible invariant subspaces MM, although no immediate counterexample comes to mind. For this reason, the authors try Abel summation instead, and consider for 0<s<10<s<1 the operators Rs ⁣:M[MTM]R_s\colon M\to [M\ominus TM] given by Rs=P+sTPL+s2T2PL2+s3T3PL3+R_s=P+sTPL+s^2T^2PL^2+s^3T^3PL^3+\cdots; it is easy\break to show that the series converges in norm. To prove that M=\break [M \ominus TM], it suffices to check that (a) RsC\|R_s\|\le C for some constant independent of ss, and (b) RsffR_sf\to f in the topology of uniform convergence on compacts in the unit disk. This is so because Rsf[MTM]R_sf\in [M\ominus TM] then converges weakly to fMf\in M as s1s\to1. Part (b) is easy; the trick is to obtain (a). The authors show at an early stage that for λD\lambda\in\bold D, M=(M\ominus TM)+\break (T-\lambda)M, and that the sum is direct (in the Banach space sense). They write QλfQ_\lambda f for the skewed projection operator MMTMM\to M\ominus TM associated with this decomposition. The operator QλQ_\lambda has a convergent Taylor series expansion Qλ=P+λPL+λ2PL2+λ3PL3+Q_\lambda=P+\lambda PL+\lambda^2 PL^2+\lambda^3PL^3+\cdots, which very much resembles the expression for RsR_s. In fact, one sees that Rsf(w)=Qswf(w)R_sf(w)=Q_{sw}f(w). Now one observes that Qλf(λ)=f(λ)Q_\lambda f(\lambda)=f(\lambda), because the element of (Tλ)M(T-\lambda)M which one has to add to QλfQ_\lambda f to obtain ff vanishes at the point λ\lambda. It follows that Rsf(w)f(w)R_sf(w)\to f(w) normally in D\bold D as s1s\to1. We come to the hard part: obtaining the uniform boundedness of the operators RsR_s. What is needed is a concrete representation formula for the norm in MM which makes it possible to compare the norms of ff and RsfR_sf. Here, the factorization theory due to the reviewer [J. Reine Angew. Math. 422 (1991), 45--68; MR1133317 (93c:30053)], and subsequent improvements by Duren-Khavinson-Shapiro-Sundberg, come to assistance. Let φ\varphi be an La2L^2_a-inner function, and let f[φ]f\in[\varphi], the invariant subspace generated by φ\varphi. The norm of ff can then be expressed in terms of the quotient f/φf/\varphi. That formula suggests the norm identity (1) f2=π1DQwf2dA(w)+π2D×DΓ(z,w)ΔzΔwQwf(z)2dA(z)dA(w)\|f\|^2=\pi^{-1}\int_\bold D\|Q_w f\|^2dA(w)+\pi^{-2}\int_{\bold D\times\bold D}\Gamma(z,w) \Delta_z\Delta_w|Q_wf(z)|^2\,dA(z)\,dA(w), which turns out to be valid for general invariant subspaces MM, where Γ(z,w)\Gamma(z,w) is the biharmonic Green function for the unit disk (suitably normalized), which is known to be positive. One first checks that the formula (1) holds for all ff in [MTM][M\ominus TM]. Second, a related integral formula for the norm in MM, in terms of integrals along concentric circles, is established for all fMf\in M. Then an intricate argument, involving Green's formula and rather subtle analysis of signs of functions, shows that for fMf\in M, we have at least a \ge inequality in (1). To get the identity (1) for general fMf\in M, it is necessary to show first that M=[MTM]M=[M\ominus TM]. Formula (1), which we know to hold for f[MTM]f\in [M\ominus TM] and with \ge for general fMf\in M, applies to Rsf[MTM]R_s f\in[M\ominus TM] with equality, and if we notice that QwRsf(z)=Qswf(z)Q_wR_sf(z)=Q_{sw}f(z), we get (2) Rsf2=π1DQswf2dA(w)+π2D×DΓ(z,w)ΔzΔwQswf(z)2dA(z)dA(w)\|R_sf\|^2= \pi^{-1}\int_\bold D\|Q_{sw} f\|^2dA(w)+\pi^{-2}\int_{\bold D\times\bold D} \Gamma(z,w)\Delta_z\Delta_w|Q_{sw}f(z)|^2\,dA(z)\,dA(w). An almost radial monotonicity property of Γ(z,w)\Gamma(z,w) in the ww variable then shows that the last term on the right-hand side of (2) has a lim sup\limsup as s1s\to1 bounded by twice the value one gets when ss is set equal 11. Moreover, the first term on the right-hand side of (2) has a lim sup\limsup as s1s\to 1 which equals what one gets when s=1s=1 is plugged in. Thus, lim supsRsf2R1f2f\limsup_s\|R_sf\|\le 2\|R_1f\|\le2\|f\|. It follows that RsffR_sf\to f weakly, which completes the proof. In the paper, it is even shown that RsffR_sf\to f in norm as s1s\to1. Incidentally, the proof also answers affirmatively one of the conjectures raised by the reviewer concerning polynomial approximation in certain weighted Bergman spaces [in Linear and complex analysis. Problem book 3. Part II, 114, Lecture Notes in Math., 1574, Springer, Berlin, 1994]. The above-mentioned theorem is new also in the case when the wandering subspace MTMM\ominus TM is one-dimensional. The theorem seems to represent a breakthrough in our understanding of the invariant subspaces of the Bergman space. What is desirable and remains to be developed is a better understanding of the wandering subspaces
    corecore